Rating Curve

I have to leave a rating which I kinda wish I didn’t have to cause for a level like this I don’t think it’s really right to rate this in terms of a level itself when its moreso the thought of the creator. I do think this is a good representation of feeling as if “high expectations from others will crush you” (paraphrasing PAHC’s review) as I can relate to how my mindset felt generally when I was in middle school. Really appreciate seeing levels such as these as it makes me know I’m not alone when I feel any kind of negative thoughts that can be seen as very bottom of the barrel.

Some people are a little overly-pretentious when it comes to Krmal's levels but I can't deny his 2.0-2.1 run was iconic. Hungry Humphrey is another silly level that has a few goofy sections to it: Humphrey is hungry, he eat the block design, he eat the saw, he go have frat party, you get shat out like some taco bell it's great. It's just a nice interesting level of it's time and that's about it, nothing particularly awful with it just not something that's godly either.

This level (as well as a few others) to me has shown the divide within the community especially since late 2.1 on how people compare levels. I'll be honest I appreciate "it back" by HangyKing for it's uniqueness but I feel like some parts of the community treat uniqueness as the sole benefactor of a good level. I've seen this level called slop, I've seen this level called boring, I've seen a lot of disses for a level (and creator) who/that I think has really held a torch for modern creators in the late 2.1 era. Gameplay especially the 2nd half is mad frustrating so I gotta knock it down points there but dont sleep on this one.